Analisis Usability Website QuickEdu Menggunakan System Usability Scale pada Siswa SMAN 16 Surabaya

Anggita Prameswari; Asif Faroqi; Anita Wulansari

doi:10.30998/14p9qp10

Authors

Anggita Prameswari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur Author
Asif Faroqi Author
Anita Wulansari Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/14p9qp10

Keywords:

QuickEdu, Website, E-learning, System Usability Scale (SUS), usability

Abstract

E-learning is an electronic-based information technology application via the internet designed for learning purposes. SMAN 16 Surabaya has implemented e-learning since 2014. However, SMAN 16 Surabaya has not yet committed to evaluating their information technology, including the QuickEdu website. One method that can be used to evaluate the use of technology or applications is usability analysis. Usability is a quality attribute that evaluates how easy a user interface can be used. Usability testing is expected to encourage users to return to the website. In this research, the method used to test usability is the System Usability Scale (SUS). The research objects are students of SMAN 16 Surabaya who have used the QuickEdu website. The sampling technique used is proportionate stratified random sampling. From 300 respondents, the average SUS score for the QuickEdu website was 71.93 with Adjective Ratings classified as Good, Grade Scales (letter grade scale) included a C, and Acceptability Ranges (acceptability range) classified as Acceptable. Suggestions for improvement for QuickEdu include improving ease of navigation and clarity of features, standardizing the appearance and terminology for consistency, increasing the speed, stability, and clarity of system feedback, and providing training or interactive guides for new users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Brooke, J. (2020a). SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation In Industry, November 1995, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35

Brooke, J. (2020b). SUS : A Retrospective. January 2013.

Caglar, E., & Mentes, S. A. (2012). The usability of university websites - A study on European University of Lefke. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 11(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2012.048340

Farida, L. D., & Sismoro, H. (n.d.). PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT USABILITY GOOGLE CLASSROOM BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF TEACHERS PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI.

Hesen, J. A. (2021). Investigating and improving the system usability scale for usability evaluation in practice Investigating and Improving the System Usability Scale for Usability Evaluation in Practice by Jolijn An ’ na Hesen identity number 0948179 in partial fulfilment o.

Istiqomah, N. F., & Anggoro, S. (2025). Implementation of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) Approach in Improving Critical Reasoning Ability and Collaboration of Grade IV Elementary School in Science Subject in Pagedongan District. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 25(2022), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v25i.1678

Lee, S. S., & Wella. (2018). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model Penggunaan E-Learning pada Mahasiswa Studi Kasus: Universitas Multimedia Nusantara. ULTIMA InfoSys, IX(2), 71–71.

Marcus, A. (2002). Experience Intelligent Design User Interfaces Information Visualization AM+A White Paper Return on Investment for Usable User-Interface Design: Examples and Statistics. 1994(2002), 510–527. http://bamanda.com/joomla_uploads/whitepapers/AM+A_ROIWhitePaper_20Apr0 1.pdf

Muh. Ihwan Rosyadi, S. (2022). KORELASI ANTARA PERSEPSI PENGELOLAAN DAN LAYANAN PUSTAKA DENGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR DI DIGITAL LIBRARY UNY. Computing Handbook: Two-Volume Set, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16768-21

Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Https://Www.Nngroup.Com/.

Rozali, N. B. N., & Said, M. Y. B. (2016). Usability testing on government agencies web portal: A study on Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) web portal. 2015 9th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference, MySEC 2015, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MySEC.2015.7475192

Sanaky, M. M. (2021). ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB KETERLAMBATAN PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG ASRAMA MAN 1 TULEHU MALUKU TENGAH. Jurnal Simetrik, 11(1), 432–439.

Sauro, J. (2011a). Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Measuring U. https://measuringu.com/sus/#:~:text=It is the 25th anniversary,references in over 600 publications.

Sauro, J. (2011b). SUStisfied? Little-known system usability scale facts. User Experience Magazine, 10(3). https://uxpamagazine.org/sustified/

Sołek-Borowska, C. (2018). The use and benefits of information communication technology by Polish small and medium sized enterprises. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 6(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2018.6(1)211-225

Sukmasetya, P., Setiawan, A., & Arumi, E. R. (2020). Penggunaan Usability Testing Sebagai Metode Evaluasi Website Krs Online Pada Perguruan Tinggi. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 9(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v9i1.24691

Zarish, S. S., Habib, S., & Islam, M. (2019). Analyzing usability of educational websites using automated tools. 2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, ICCIS 2019, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISci.2019.8716462