Tinjauan Filosofis The Ascent Of Man Dalam Perspektif Fisika Modern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/1j837606Keywords:
Cognitive Evolution, Philosophy of Science, Modern Physics, The Ascent of Man, Jacob BronowskiAbstract
This study aims to conduct a philosophical review of the relevance of Jacob Bronowski's thoughts in his work, The Ascent of Man, amidst the development of modern physics. Bronowski views human history as an ascent driven by the unique ability of humans to understand the laws of nature through the integration of reason and imagination. However, philosophical questions arise regarding whether this humanistic narrative of ascent remains consistent with the increasingly abstract and often counter-intuitive findings of modern physics. Using qualitative-philosophical methods and a comparative approach, this study analyzes the traces of Bronowski's thoughts through three main pillars of modern physics: 1) The Uncertainty Principle and the limits of absolute knowledge; 2) Theory of Relativity and the shift in space-time perception; 3) Quantum Mechanics in the context of the connection between the observer and reality. The results of the study show that the traces of The Ascent of Man remain relevant through the concept of intellectual humility proposed by Bronowski, where modern physics is no longer seen as a tool to seek certainty of dogma, but as a means to understand the position of humans in a dynamic universe. This study concludes that the perspective of modern physics actually strengthens Bronowski's thesis that science is the most noble human activity, because it forces humans to continue to evolve cognitively while realizing their ethical limitations in the face of the complexity of matter.
Downloads
References
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. Little, Brown and Company.
Bronowski, J. (1978). The common sense of science. Harvard University Press.
Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. Wiley.
Capra, F. (1975). The tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Shambhala Publications.
Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos: Space, time, and the texture of reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
Hanson, R. O. (2011). Jacob Bronowski and the humanist interpretation of science. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(3), 263–274.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper & Row.
Kamal, Abu. S, Fitriya. (2025). Antara Teori dan Realitas: Refleksi Filosofis dan Interpretasi
Kosmologi Kuantum. INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 4(1),44 -57
Krane, K. S. (2012). Modern physics (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Mermin, N. D. (1985). Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory. Physics Today, 38(4), 38–47.
Rovelli, C. (2021). Helgoland: Making sense of the quantum revolution. Riverhead Books.
Suryana, N. (2018). Filsafat ilmu dan sejarah perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Jurnal Filsafat, 28(1), 18–34.
Wiyatno, W. (2015). Implikasi filosofis mekanika kuantum terhadap pandangan dunia deterministik. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 19(56), 45–52.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715–775.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sari Prabandari, Suyitno Muslim, Annis Kandriasari, Wisnu Djatmiko (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






