Pengaruh Konsentrasi Rendah Larutan Garam Dapur Terhadap Respons Medan Magnet Dalam Sistem Elektrolisis

Putri Haliza Rachma; Anita Kuraesyih; Agus Timorwoko; Annisa Dewi Insyirah

doi:10.30998/hkjts523

Penulis

Putri Haliza Rachma Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Penulis
Anita Kuraesyih Penulis
Agus Timorwoko Penulis
Annisa Dewi Insyirah Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/hkjts523

Kata Kunci:

Elektrolisis, Garam Dapur, Medan Magnet, Arus Listrik, Konsentrasi Larutan

Abstrak

Electrolysis is an electrochemical process that converts electrical energy into chemical energy, whose performance is strongly influenced by the properties of the electrolyte solution used. Table salt is one of the electrolytes commonly used in laboratory experiments because it is easily obtained and capable of ionizing in water. At low concentrations, the number of free ions in the solution becomes limited, thereby affecting the magnitude of the electric current produced. In addition, the presence of an external magnetic field can influence ion movement through the Lorentz force, potentially altering the electric current response. This study aimed to analyze the effect of low concentration variations of table salt solution on electric current in an electrolysis system and to compare the system response under conditions without a magnetic field and with a magnetic field. The research method used was an experimental method with three variations of solution concentration, namely 0.01 M, 0.05 M, and 0.10 M. Electric current measurements were conducted at a constant voltage of 3 V and a solution volume of 200 mL. The results showed that increasing the solution concentration tended to increase the electric current produced. Furthermore, the application of a magnetic field caused changes in the current value, indicating that the magnetic field affected ion movement in the electrolyte solution. Keywords: Electrolysis, table salt, magnetic field, electric current, solution concentration

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Abdullah, M., Pramudya, Y., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Electrical conductivity characteristics of electrolyte solutions at various salt concentrations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012045

Abdurahman, R., Eliza, R., Manggala, A., Suci Ningsih, A., & Effendy A, S. (2021). Produksi Gas Hidrogen Berdasarkan Pengaruh Luas Penampang Terhadap Konsentrasi Larutan Elektrolit dan Suplai Arus Dengan Metode Elektrolisis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 1(11), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.103

Aditya, M. W., Erlinawati, E., & Febriana, I. (2023). Efektivitas tegangan terhadap produksi gas hidrogen melalui proses elektrolisis air laut. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 30047–30053. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11849

Akhlaqi, M. B., Meryaninda, M., & Ariyanto, L. P. (2025). Pengaruh konsentrasi larutan elektrolit dan tegangan arus listrik terhadap proses electrorefining tembaga. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Komputer, 5(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.51903/juritek.v5i2.4510

Atkins, P., & de Paula, J. (2018). Physical Chemistry (11th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bard, A. J., & Faulkner, L. R. (2001). Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C., Woodward, P., & Stoltzfus, M. (2018). Chemistry: The Central Science (14th ed.). Pearson.

Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2016). Chemistry (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Cussler, E. L. (2009). Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Fujisawa, N., & Nishiyama, H. (2020). Magnetohydrodynamic effects on ion transport in electrolyte solutions. Electrochimica Acta, 354, 136709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136709

Hamann, C. H., Hamnett, A., & Vielstich, W. (2007). Electrochemistry (2nd ed.). Wiley-VCH.

Hindayani, A., & Hamim, N. (2022). Akurasi dan presisi metode sekunder pengukuran konduktivitas menggunakan Sel Jones tipe E untuk pemantauan kualitas air minum. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Analysis (IJCA), 5(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijca.vol5.iss1.art5

Housecroft, C. E., & Sharpe, A. G. (2018). Inorganic Chemistry (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kanza, N. R. F., Sudarti, S., & Maryani, M. (2020). Pengaruh paparan medan magnet Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) terhadap pH dan daya hantar listrik pada proses fermentasi basah kopi liberika (Coffea liberica) dengan penambahan α amilase. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 6(2), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i2.3294

Koryta, J., Dvorak, J., & Kavan, L. (1993). Principles of Electrochemistry (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Maharani, S., Muliyono, S., & Putri, E. R. (2022). Kaitan konduktivitas listrik dengan konsentrasi larutan garam dapur. Progressive Physics Journal, 3(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.30872/ppj.v3i2.906

Miomandre, F., Sadki, S., Audebert, P., Méallet-Renault, R., & Clavier, G. (2018). Electrochemistry: A Practical Introduction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96107-2

Newman, J., & Thomas-Alyea, K. E. (2012). Electrochemical Systems (3rd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.

Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2017). General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications (11th ed.). Pearson.

Safitri, W. D., Wardana, D., Ramadhan, D. S., Fahmi, J., Zubir, M., Purba, S. K., Puandra, E. M., & Siregar, N. (2025). Effect of organic and inorganic compounds on the conductivity of salt solutions. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Science and Technology (IJCST), 8(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.24114/ijcst.v8i2.70635

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2019). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Suminten, N., Arjo, S., Roza, L., & Fitriana, A. (2024). Perbandingan konsentrasi larutan garam dan air kelapa terhadap nilai konduktivitas listrik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v9i2.4067

Wahyuni, S., Sudarti, S., & Subiki, S. (2020). Pengaruh medan magnet terhadap konduktivitas larutan elektrolit. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(3), 112–118.