Local Cultural Aesthetics in The Logo Design of The Museum Batik Indonesia

Authors

  • Dwi Ramayanti Universitas Mercu Buana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/cs.v8i1.1984

Keywords:

Batik, Institution, Logo, Culture, Aesthetics

Abstract

This research is based on the high importance of cultural institutions in designing a strong and contextual brand identity amid the dominance of global design. Batik is not just a motif, but a process, a technique of decorating fabric. Almost all regions in the country have their own batik motifs that symbolize the characteristics of their region. Javanese people wear batik in their daily lives. Batik plays a role in various activities, such as childbirth, weddings, and others. Batik motifs from various regions in Indonesia have specific meanings. For example, the kawung motif is a batik motif from Yogyakarta, shaped like a split palm fruit, which symbolizes the four directions as a form of brotherhood. The research method used in this study was descriptive qualitative with visual analysis techniques. Data was obtained through interviews with museum officials and visual observation as well as document analysis. The analysis was conducted using The Function Complex, Brand Identity Elements, Trichotomy Semiotics, and Visual Communication Design (logo principles and design principles). The results of this study indicate that the stylization of batik fabric in museum logos has undergone a transformation in meaning, function, and form that is aligned with the needs of contemporary visual communication. Stylization not only serves as an aesthetic element, but also functions as institutional legitimacy, cultural value, and identity differentiation. This research contributes to the development of a theory of brand identity based on culture and also provides practical recommendations for designing the brand identity of Indonesian cultural institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andari, L. S. (2025). Strategi rebranding museum sandi yogyakarta dalam membangun brand awareness. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat LPPM Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, 3, 1256 1266.

Antara News. (2024, 1 November). Menbud soroti pentingnya standarisasi museum untuk daya tarik budaya. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4436845/menbud-soroti-pentingnya-standarisasi-museum-untuk-daya-tarik-budaya

Varlina, V., & Maulini, C. (2024). Representasi dan budaya visual logo Haus! terhadap brand attractiveness di kalangan anak muda. Gestalt: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 6(1), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.33005/gestalt.v6i1.188

Christomy, T., & Yuwono, U. (Ed.). (2004). Semiotika budaya. Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Budaya, Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia.

CNBC Indonesia. (2023, 21 April). Minat ke museum memprihatinkan, ini penyebabnya kata ahli. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/entrepreneur/20230421042423-25431525/minat-ke-museum-memprihatinkan-ini-penyebabnya-kata-ahli

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dufrenne, M. (1973). The phenomenology of aesthetic experience (E. S. Casey, A. A. Anderson, W. Domingo, & E. Gilbert, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.

Fatoni, A., & Jupriani, J. (2023). Representasi budaya Indonesia dalam logo G20 Indonesia 2023. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Seni, Desain dan Media (JURRSENDEM), 2(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrsendem.v2i2.2031

InfoPublik. (2022, 10 Agustus). Sogan, Batik Klasik yang Jadi Buruan Wisatawan. InfoPublik.id. https://infopublik.id/kategori/asean-paragames 2022/655829/sogan-batik-klasik-yang-jadi-buruan-wisatawan

Malik, A., Istianah, R., & Bagja, B. R. (2021). Analisis semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce tentang makna logo pariwisata Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Desain Komunikasi Visual, 6(1), 39–48.

Media Indonesia. (2024, 2 Oktober). Batik simbol jati diri dan warisan budaya Indonesia yang harus dilestarikan. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/705560/batik-simbol-jati-diri-dan-warisan-budaya-indonesia-yang-harus-dilestarikan

Museum Batik Indonesia. (n.d.). Profil Museum Batik Indonesia. Diakses pada 5 Januari 2026, dari https://museumbatikindonesia.kemdikbud.go.id/

Papanek, V. (2006). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change (2nd ed.). Thames & Hudson.

Pugersari, D. (2024). Kajian bentuk gunungan wayang sebagai representasi budaya Indonesia pada visual logo halal Indonesia. Kartala Visual Studies, 3(1), 1–12. https://jurnal.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/kartala

Rand, P. (1985). Paul Rand: A designer's art. Yale University Press.

Ratna, I. N. (2010). Metodologi penelitian: Kajian budaya dan ilmu sosial humaniora pada umumnya. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rustan, S. (2019). Warna. Batara Imaji.

Sulasman, & Gumilar, S. (2013). Teori-teori kebudayaan: Dari teori hingga aplikasi. Pustaka Setia.

Supriyono, R. (2010). Desain komunikasi visual: Teori dan aplikasi. Andi Offset. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2019). Keajaiban batik. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Dasar.

Suryajaya, M. (2016). Sejarah estetika: Ke era kontemporer. Gang Kabel & Indie Book Corner.

Tinarbuko, S. (2015). Semiotika komunikasi visual (Edisi revisi). Kakilangit Kencana.

Varlina, V., & Maulini, C. (2024). Representasi dan budaya visual logo Haus! terhadap brand attractiveness di kalangan anak muda. Gestalt: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 6(1), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.33005/gestalt.v6i1.188

Wheeler, A. (2009). Designing brand identity: An essential guide for the whole branding team (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Ramayanti, D. (2026). Local Cultural Aesthetics in The Logo Design of The Museum Batik Indonesia. Cultural Syndrome, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/cs.v8i1.1984